Health Professionals Can Use Fracking Research to Prevent Future Illnesses

By path2positive

The health implications of unconventional gas production are quite alarming, as an increasing number of studies reveal from top universities such as Cornell, Yale, the University of Washington and Colorado State. Fracking research published in The Journal of Environmental Science and Health found that government monitoring was insufficient to address chemical mixtures and other risks. Other study results suggest that natural gas extraction may impact the health of animals living nearby, either through water or airborne exposures to contaminants. As the Dallas Morning News reports below, "Unsolved riddles abound. No one can say, for example, how the combination of airborne chemicals from gas production in any one spot might affect a person’s health, in part because the array might change with each shifting wind." The health sector can use this research on fracking to prevent future illnesses by working toward climate solutions. The overlap between climate and health issues are significant. Find out how you can get involved today.


Studies Explore Concerns About Natural-Gas Production and Health

The Dallas Morning News

By Randy Lee Loftis I March 3, 2015

Dogs serve as living recorders of toxic exposure. Cattle have trouble breeding. People report headaches, dizziness, difficulty breathing and a raft of other ills.

Those are a few of the findings in a new suite of academic studies on natural-gas production and health being published Tuesday.

People’s and animals’ troubles subside, one study found, when they move away from places where companies are producing natural gas with unconventional methods — that is, hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, the process already used on tens of thousands of wells in North Texas.

The research, mostly by university scientists, centers mostly on another region where gas production has moved into established communities, the Marcellus Shale field in Pennsylvania. But it explores the same questions that arise in North Texas neighborhoods that now find wells and processing plants as newcomers.

Bit by bit, science is plugging the gaps in public understanding left by limits and inadequacies of past research.

“This is a great time to be researching and writing about the topic of air pollution associated with unconventional natural gas production,” said Robert Swarthout, a postdoctoral investigator at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. He has published research on shale gas production and health but was not involved in this week’s new studies.

Read more

 

 

 

Subscribe

Stay connected and get updates from Climate for Health.

Subscribe

You May Also Like

September 23, 2020

On September 22, 2020, the first day of autumn, an equinox occurred marking when the sun passed directly over the earth’s equator. Prior to and...

Read More

September 22, 2020

In the present moment, and mere days before World Environmental Health Day on September 26, the intersection between climate change and preparedness is, sadly, quite...

Read More

September 20, 2020

In the midst of a global pandemic, with climate disasters raging across the country, many Americans are laser focused on one date: November 3. “The...

Read More
climate-for-helth-logo-white

 

Climate for Health is a program of ecoAmerica

 

© ecoAmerica 2006 – 2020 The contents of this website may be shared and used under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International License.